The Shotgun Blog
« Bob Barr rEVOLution? | Main | Will Bob Barr the Democrats from the White House? »
Saturday, April 05, 2008
Tom Lukiwski: Two Words, Seven Letters
After watching all of the nonsense over Tom Lukiwski's seventeen year-old comments, my entire response is two words and seven letters long. I'll let you guess at what that is, since this is a family blog.
For some reason, this video seems appropriate:
Seriously, folks.
It was seventeen years ago. Anyone who has watched the video can clearly see that it was in jest. Are the lives of the Canadian left really so empty that they can be so agitated about something that an MP that I never even heard of before the day before yesterday said nearly two decades ago, beer in hand - seemingly in good humour?
Get a life, people.
Posted by Adam T. Yoshida on April 5, 2008 in Canadian Politics | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b5d69e200e551aad2828833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Tom Lukiwski: Two Words, Seven Letters:
Comments
Exactly, "get a life people".
How to deal with this kind of gotcha politics when the losers on the Liberal/Left and their willing pawns and supporters in the media like Bobby Fife, Jane Taber, Newman et al is to call their bosses and demand something more than National Enquirer journalism. They've lost all common sense. Like the Liberals they love , they're part of the gotcha politics being played by the desperate Liberals.
Let's hope there is nothing more from Lukewski on this matter, he has apologized. He doesn't need to grovel and bow to the hypocrites calling for his resignation. Brison and Goodale are quite vocal as expected, given the state their party is in they're coming across as desperate fools trying to gain political capital anywhere they can.
Those two also remind us of Income Trust leaks so maybe they better shut the hell up before someone decides to start an inquiry into their games.
Posted by: Liz J | 2008-04-05 5:19:04 PM
It is unreal how the left will dig at something until they ruin a man, woman, family. These are the same things they claim to protect. I have changed many of my opinions in the past 20 years. Whycan't this man. I also DO NOT think the NDP found this tape. It surfaced when the Sask Party is growing popularity. Someone has profitted from it and was told to go away. My opinion. We all evolve. Let the man get on with his career and his life. He has demonstrated nothing but integrity and professionalism while in office. Move on and let it be. But of course the loony left will press on and on...but will ultimately show how shallow they are.
Posted by: Boggy | 2008-04-05 5:37:24 PM
What are the going to do next? Call for Stephen Harpers resignation because he once cheated on a math test in grade 6. I Mean the guy made ONE homophobic slur in his teens when he was drunk. He hasn't since or recently or since made any homophobic remarks so you can't really claim he is a homophobe.
Posted by: Ometochtli | 2008-04-05 9:21:33 PM
Actually, he was 40.
Posted by: exile | 2008-04-05 9:50:31 PM
Sure, he was forty - but, come on. It's no worse than what you see on South Park from week to week. It was clearly meant, in private, as a joke.
Also, let's get real here - 1991 was a very, very, very different time in this regard. While I certianly lament political correctness and how it's changed it, it's certianly fair to say that, in this regard, it was a very different world in 1991.
Posted by: Adam Yoshida | 2008-04-05 10:41:25 PM
Why do CONservatives have such low standards for public office holders? Why do they want to drag parliament down even further into the gutter? I say we need a high standard. We have seen Steve Harper and Brian Mulroney besmirch the high office of Prime Minister with their cynicism and attempts to bribe people to vote their way. We have seen the lies Harper told his supporters about being able to reverse same-sex marriage and his failure to deliver on those lies once in office. We have seen Steve's hidden agenda--it is all about opportunism! Surprise surprise. These are the same folks who said they were going to do politics differently! Sure is different--gutter politics is what they are delivering.
Posted by: ROGER | 2008-04-06 1:37:16 AM
Roger , if there is one thing I`ve noticed over the last two years it is that Harper has decided to fight fire with fire .Standing for any of this nonsense would be comparable to the Israelis not fighting back with the animals in Palestine and being wiped out .The same as allowing the Muslim scourge to bully and outbreed decent populations. He does what he has to do to keep from being overrun by a rabid pack of wild eyed castrati , willing to do anything possible to ' get back in power ' in order to finish their campaign of perversity. Vote Liberal.
Posted by: daveh | 2008-04-06 7:42:41 AM
ummm Roger,
IF there was ever a government that bribed, payed off, twisted truths, robbed the people of the land for their own political gain, ...it's the LIEberals. The Conservative party has real, normal people, with real, normal opinions. Not a bunch of self serving/righteous, pigs at a trough like the lefties!!!! Besmirched the high office?? I think not Rog. We all seen how the LIEberals acted in the last campaign. Trying to make the public believe that Harper would put soldiers in our streets, 61 number one priorities, etc. I guess you are another who has never said something you regret!!
Harper is the best leader this country has seen in decades! He actually leads.
Posted by: Boggy | 2008-04-06 8:18:13 AM
Hey Rodger
The lowest of standards were achieved by the LIEberals. Nothing could be lower than STEALING from the Taxpayer, and giving that money to liberal minded people like you. What foundation are you in charge of?
Posted by: Roberto | 2008-04-06 9:03:22 AM
Roger,
If people were truly honest, you would learn that the majority of Canadians find the gay life-style somewhat abhorrent. Most are simply being polite and going along with, and being tolerant of the freakish gay parades, the sodomite sex and bizarre nature of transsexuals.
Back '92 it was not a mortal sin to have an opinion on this social phenomenon. Now that the 'faggots' have hijacked the political elite, polite company must bear the facade of total acceptance of this perverted life-style lived by a tiny minority of the population.
I think most people don't care what others do in the privacy of their homes. Homosexuals are quite entitled to live their lives the way they want to. The problem is that they go too far in putting their weirdness in the faces of straight society and traditional Canadian values.
Take your kids to the Next Gay Pride parade in Toronto and splain it to them with a straight face.
Posted by: John West | 2008-04-06 11:16:13 AM
let's see: Mulroney ripped off over $2 million dollars for himself from taxpayers, on top of the $600k or so he got in bribes from Schreiber, again at the expense of taxpayers. Harper tried to bribe Chuck Cadman to throw his vote the CONway --given that monies given to parties are subsidized by taxpayers, Harper was using taxpayer monies to try to bribe a MP! As if that is not bad enough, we have the CONservative party using taxpayer money to mail out campaign literature all over the country and using taxpayer funded campaign monies to unlawfully circumvent Elections Canada campaign finance laws in what is a case of money-laundering! From Grant Devine to Bill vander Zalm to Brian Mulroney to Steve Harper, a straight line of skulduggery and diddling of the taxpayers! How much did Conrad Black contribute in stolen funds to the cause? Why was Germany allowed to interfere in Canadian politics--via Schreiber's bribe money? Why was it okay for an unelected senator to become a cabinet minister--without having to face question period--and why was Emerson welcomed in a floor crossing if floor crossings are wrong? Why did Gurmant Grewal try to auction off his vote and still be allowed to remain a party member? Because that is what the CONservative party is all about!! Shame, shame shame shame!
Posted by: ROGER | 2008-04-06 12:39:17 PM
John West asserts that the Steve Harper CONservatives are opportunists in the "values" issue of same sex marriage and gay rights. If John West is correct, then Harper and his party are cynical liars and opportunists of the worst kind whose values are flexible on bedrock issues, all about the ends justifying the means! Wow, and I thought I was critical of Harper! LOL!
Posted by: ROGER | 2008-04-06 12:43:28 PM
It's baaaaaaaaack...... Don't feed the trolls people!
Posted by: Muzzie | 2008-04-06 2:25:07 PM
ROGER is a graduate of the Richard Warman school
of entrapment and maximum disruption.
He is to be ignored.
Posted by: ralph | 2008-04-06 3:15:46 PM
Adam, you said it all, "lets get real".
Problem is getting real is not something that comes naturally for the Left or the holier-than-thou crowd who are perfect in every way. Even Jesus Christ would not come up to their standards.
The best we as Conservatives can take from all the abuse is we are held to higher standards. For anyone paying attention, we meet those standards far and away above what we've witnessed from the past decades of Liberal decay and corruption.
Never in memory have we seen such desperation for power at any cost from any political party as we're witnessing today from the Liberal party of Canada. In medical terms they're not just constipated, they're impacted.
Posted by: Liz J | 2008-04-06 3:45:29 PM
I think "faggots" are those who promote war from their living room.
Posted by: Marc | 2008-04-06 3:47:21 PM
We all remember ROGER, don't we?
He was a master of self-righteous indignation when defending his jihadist brethren last year.
The only difference now is he's even more self-righteous.
BTW, what did Stephen Harper have to do with an incident that happened 17 years ago in Saskatchewan?
As we recall, Stephen Harper came from the Reform Party, which was formed as a protest to Mulroney's party. As I recall, the old PC party was punished when voters whittled its representation down to two seats in the 1993 election.
Nice try, though, in attempting to make the current government responsible for somebody else's misdeeds.
Let those among us without sin cast the first stone.
That includes you, jihadi-lover.
Posted by: set you free | 2008-04-06 3:48:20 PM
Tom Lukiwski was wrong about one thing for which he should apologize:
Homosexuals are fastidious about their appearance and do not have dirt on their fingernails.
Farmers and mechanics should be offended.
Posted by: Bocanut | 2008-04-06 5:26:30 PM
Good one Bocanut....Joe Volpe,longtime liberal,leadership candidate,cabinet minister,etc., about 3 or 4 years ago said in the HofC that a certain MP "never met a 3 dollar bill he didn't like". Insulting,yes,anti-gay,possibly,reported by the media,not a chance.
Posted by: wallyj | 2008-04-06 6:30:16 PM
Rodger dodger
Base to Rodger. Base to Rodger. Don't forget to change your diaper before you go to bed. If it gets too cold in the Artic, you can try to find some one willing to cuddle with you. See if Stephan is available, or maybe Ralph Goodale. Sheeeshh!!
Posted by: Roberto | 2008-04-06 6:55:01 PM
"Youth for Volpe" was almost payback enough for that idiot.
http://www.youthforvolpe.blogspot.com/
I don't recall the 3 dollar comment but it sounds typical.
Posted by: Bocanut | 2008-04-06 7:10:40 PM
Mulroney owes Canadian taxpayers over $2,800,000 plus interest and costs. Why has Steve Harper prevented the collection of this debt owed to the citizens of Canada? Why has Harper tried to bribe a MP to throw his vote the CONway? That is just plain criminal! Why do people on this blog defend criminal behaviour by politicians? Have you no shame?
I recall how Reform was going to do politics differently--they were never ever going to take the MP pensions, nor live in the official residences nor gallavant around in the chauffeured limos. They were going to bring decorum to parliamentary debate! Now watch Harper snarl in parliament, throwing personal insults and libellous accusations with abandon. Of course it all came unstuck long ago, when one of the Reformers challenged another MP to show his "gonads" and invited him to a fist fight on the floor of parliament! Some respect huh. Then there was Preston's new hairstyle and next Preston was ensconced in Stornoway, just like Harper is now comfortable in 24 Sussex Drive and the hicks from the wilds of Alberta and BC could not wait to jump in the limos and they long ago pulled up to the trough of MP pensions! Opportunistic scoundrels! They have no shame, and their supporters are with even less shame than their politicians! Mulroney was Harper's mentor--that is all one really needs to know.
No one here can give reply to these universally known truths. All that they are capable of is bleating like the herd they are. They are afterall Levant and Steyn followers, for whom Conrad the Thief Black, criminal inmate, is a hero! They glorify criminals and attack honest citizens. Such is the CONway! No honour, no honesty, no dealing in truth and facts, but eager to take refuge in lies, propaganda and spin, following the lead of Mulroney, Harper, Devine, Gerry Regan, vander Zalm and the other leaders of the CONgang.
Posted by: ROGER | 2008-04-06 7:26:12 PM
No one here is able to reply to the substantive charges against their heroes, the CONservative Reform Alliance Party of Canada, or CRAP for short.
A normal person would feel shame that a foreign government had bought the office of Prime Minister in their country, but not the CONs. A decent and honest person would react with outrage that their current prime minister engaged in a scheme to buy a Member of Parliament's vote, but not these partisans here. Fiscal conservatives would demand the government collect the millions of dollars unlawfully gained from taxpayers by a former prime minister, but not these cynics here. All is forgiven where their friends are concerned. It is the kind of behaviour one expects in 3rd world despotisms. Come to think of it, Gurmant Grewal was engaged in business dealings with the war criminal dictator of Liberia, where he lived and did business, prior to the dictators overthrow-when Grewal hightailed it via India to Canada, into the welcoming arms of the Reform Party, later the CONservative party. He felt right at home! Well, at least one corrupt crony got caught and is in jail in Florida, doing hard time. Has Levant visited Black yet?
Posted by: ROGER | 2008-04-06 7:45:22 PM
Two word, seven letters:
I resign?
Big fail.
Oh... erase!
Job over.
Why tape?
NDP burn.
Got even.
Ah, karma.
Faux pas.
Posted by: Pattern Recognition | 2008-04-06 9:22:34 PM
Amuse us some more Roger, which political party do you think deserves to govern?
Posted by: Bocanut | 2008-04-06 9:26:15 PM
What a night for trolls.
First, jihadi-lover ROGER.
Now, an appearance by the racist Pattern Recognition.
Peace be onto you.
Posted by: set you free | 2008-04-06 9:34:45 PM
Which political party deserves to govern? I suppose if one comes from the one-party state of Alberta, questions such as that are appropriate. If voters only ever vote for one party, like Albertans do, then there is no need for accountability. If outright lies, bribery and corruption and the selling of the office of prime minister to foreign powers is acceptable, then who cares who governs? The problem is not in the government, but with the citizens who accept such corruption and criminality. Why be soft on crime where your cronies are concerned? Have you no shame?
No one here can answer the charges levelled against the CONs! No one can defend the indefensible! The CONs are exposed for the cynical opportunistic crooks they are and none can dispute that fact!
Posted by: ROGER | 2008-04-06 9:35:06 PM
As the great Pierre Trudeau once said in Parliament: ‘Fuddle Duddle'
Posted by: set you free | 2008-04-06 9:43:04 PM
Karl-Heinz Schreiber worked for the German secret service and came to Canada with bags of money from Germany and financed the overthrow of Joe Clark and the installation of his man who he bankrolled into the office of prime minister of Canada and owned him! This is the same K-H Schreiber who financed the slush fund for disgraced rightwing chancellor Helmut Kohl and who ran the slush fund involving French president Mitterand, Kohl and the East German conspiracy to launder money for political campaigns! How did such crooks get a foothold in the highest office in Canada? Through the CONservative Party of Harper's advisor! By the way, what did Peter McKay and Elmer McKay know about all this crooked business? Where did the millions of dollars in bribe money go? We need a special prosecutor to dig, because the Mounties are incompetent and involved--to wit, Zaccadelli's refusal to testify about recently about the political announcements made during the last election by the RCMP! There is high treason that someone got away with!
Posted by: ROGER | 2008-04-06 9:44:22 PM
Karol, you have been reading too much of the speeches by Thabo Mbeki and the S African health minister, both of whom think like you do about HIV AIDS! LOL! For added effect, why not claim like Jacob Zuma, the notorious former deputy president cum rapist who said that showering after sex with someone who has AIDS is all that is required to protect oneself! LOL! Are you an East Bloc whacko? Education never was any good in the East Bloc and it shows! Who else is in on the conspiracy? Are you a Harper supporter? LOL! Figures.
Posted by: ROGER | 2008-04-06 10:43:40 PM
Too bad the man did'nt have the balls to stand behind his conviction. Outside Toronto and Vancouver 90% of the population would probably agree with him.
Posted by: peterj | 2008-04-06 10:48:49 PM
Karol, you are welcome. You, Mbeki, Zuma and the other whackos can celebrate your immunity to the indoctrination of the whole rest of the world about AIDS/HIV. Did you know that more heterosexual people have AIDS/HIV than homosexual people? I won't bore you with any more details, because I am not sure you would understand about CD4T cells and CD8T cells and stuff like that, because you already know it does not exist anyway! LOL! Do you have a doctorate in Intelligent Design molecular biology?
Posted by: ROGER | 2008-04-06 10:58:07 PM
Roger,
In an attempt to make a point you make the comment that more heterosexual people have AIDS/HIV than homosexual people. Would you believe that there are more people that have two arms in the USA than in Canada? I know...it's an astounding fact.
It's fine to make your point, but I believe people would prefer that you spend less time wowing everybody with your immense knowledge and at least present the basic points without the obvious distortion...and stuff like that.
My point is as follows:
It is not disputed that the spread of AIDS/HIV more rapidly spreads through populations or groups of people that have higher rates of promiscuous (use whatever word you please) behaviour. Homosexual males, as a group, exhibit higher rates of this behaviour. It is what it is and people can draw their conclusions from this. Tom said something that was regrettable, but in the 80’s and early 90’s opinions, rightly or wrongly, were different and may good people (men) made frequent homophobic comments purely out of ignorance or insecurity. We do not know if his beliefs have changed or evolved, but what he said hurts only himself now (I’d be happy to expand on this another time) and he is paying for it now. He should not resign, but let his constituents decide in the next election; like it or not that is the best check in our system.
Posted by: DJ | 2008-04-06 11:55:05 PM
Roger , it`s been said that tolerance is the last virtue of a depraved society . As depraved as you seem to be , I can`t even give you credit for tolerance ; you seem to be a small man acting like a cranky small child , trying to adjust to adulthood.
Likuiski made a corny ' joke ' at a get together among friends and spoke his mind . He thinks homos are a scourge . Maybe he`s a man of faith and believes in the verse ' No man shall lie down with another man as if he were a woman ' to paraphrase.
You should try looking at facts instead of twisting and ignoring details . e.g. Cadman , assumming that it merits debate. You state that an offer was made ; on what basis ; and if it was made , so what . These inducements are made all the time . Could it be that Chuckles decided to deceive his family and use the bribe angle to justify voting Liberal [ and keep the pension ] ; he didn`t count on his chuckleheaded wife on telling the world about it , no doubt at the behest of some liberal hack , such as yourself. And if Mulroney stole some money , let the police handle it ; how or why do you expect Harper to get involved , genius ? Do you think Harper really cares ?
Posted by: daveh | 2008-04-07 6:44:00 AM
Set You Free said, "Now, an appearance by the racist Pattern Recognition."
Set You Free also said, "Do you ever get the juvenile urge, like I do, of grabbing a mullah's headwrap, yanking real hard and watching him spin? What does this mean? What does this say about me?" Posted by: Set you free | 8-May-06 8:23:14 AM
Set You Free, I'd love to know why you think I'm a racist when you search through the site and find post after post where I take on racism, sexism, and xenophobia (most recently when I tore into Jack over the "little black sambo" mockery of Obama, or ) while you post post after post deriding and mocking Muslims (who you call muzzies at least 40 times), Serbs, and the like. Google (i.e. history) isn't on your side here.
You'll also [inconveniently] find I'm a young earth creationist as well, who subscribes to the thought that race is a contrivance.
[Insert pause where people miss my point—that SYF doesn't have much to stand on in his attack—and launch into an off-track flame war about evolution.]
"I'm not a racist, I'm against [ideology], not [ethnicity]."
Sadly, many 'only-one-race' Christians are replacing the noun 'race' with 'culture' so they can enjoy all the 'fun' of racism without the stigma. It's the Coke Zero of hate, where race war is bad, idea war is good, culture war is even better.
But back to my point: Set You Free, gather every single comment of mine in context and demonstrate by evidence that I believe in the inherent inferiority or superiority of one racial group over another, or else retract that comment.
Posted by: Pattern Recognition | 2008-04-07 8:58:29 AM
"I'm not a racist, I'm against [ideology], not [ethnicity]."
Hey !
That was from me...
And I'm not against ideologies but "ideologies that try to hurt the open society we've built and love".
Posted by: Marc | 2008-04-07 9:12:22 AM
PR:
Once you stop blaming white Christian society for your misery, that will be a good starting point for you.
Last week, the mayor of Newark, NJ was on the Glenn Beck show and he made comment appropriate to your penchant for blaming others.
Every day, PR, you have a chance to step out of your darkness and into the light.
It's not the successful that have make anybody else unsuccessful and miserable.
As the mayor said, we have choices to make every day that will make our lives better or worse.
It's nobody else's fault other than the person in the mirror.
Now, quit being such an ass and do something good with your life. It does not make you a bigger person by finding fault in others.
I retract nothing. It's up to you to define your own life.
To tell you the truth, I find your nitpicking style totallly annoying. Your energy would be better used to find out why you have this need to find fault in others and more importantly, find out how you've become so self-righteous.
Posted by: set you free | 2008-04-07 1:18:14 PM
"PR: Once you stop blaming white Christian society for your misery, that will be a good starting point for you."
Examples? One minute I'm a racist, now I'm a Black Panther or something to that effect? I sort of sense you're reaching and a little disappointed that you're not being left off the hook for a lie.
"To tell you the truth, I find your nitpicking style totallly annoying."
Well OK, since it's truth time, I find your huffy & breathless indignation annoying, your fetish for slinging clods of unsubstantiated crap at everything that moves disappointing, and your co-opting of the Gospel as a flag for your political agenda a perversion. My Nortel handset has demonstrated more embrace of the Beatitudes than you have.
"That's cause I'm too busy doing your mom. Posted by: Set you free | 15-Jan-07 3:19:03 PM"
"But to limit oneself to just Bible, while ignoring the history of the people who hashed out the issues and actually lived according to its principles, is plain shallow. This superficiality, altough preferable to out-and-out rejection, is a loss to those who believe the Bible is the end all and be all. In my opinion."
Posted by: Set you free | 29-Jun-06 11:56:22 AM
"The Bible is just a starting point. Anybody who stops their journey at the scriptures is really cheating themselves out of a full experience." Posted by: Set you free | 30-Jun-06 1:35:10 PM
Posted by: Pattern Recognition | 2008-04-07 1:58:15 PM
LOL! SO WHAT IF HARPER AND TOM FLANAGAN OFFERED A BRIBE TO BUY A VOTE OF A CANADIAN MP? How low have you CONservatives sunk to even pose such a cynical comment in public? It is a criminal offense to buy an MP's vote! It is high treason to sell the office of Canadian prime minister to the control of foreign powers (Schreiber, acting as a secret agent for Germany)--why has there not been a firing squad on Parliament Hill? Why has the German ambassador not been called in to explain his country's act of war?
Mulroney steals over $2,800,000 of Canadian taxpayers' money (as far as we know), and Harper is not interested? Whatever happened to fiscal conservativism and being accountable and responsible in how public money is spent and handled? You folks might like throwing money away on politicians, but I sure as hell expect Harper to go after taxpayers' money and collect every penny owing! what kind of deal is Harper in with Mulroney? We have already seen Harper's ethics vis a vis the dying Chuck Cadman, whom a poster here sees fit to besmirch with vile accusations! CONServatives have no shame--they have no ethics. They are opportunists of the worst kind. Harper would sell his grandmother to get a majority government. That is the way these people are. under the cloak of religion, they are scoundrels of the Elmer Gantry type.
Posted by: ROGER | 2008-04-07 2:43:04 PM
LOL! PATTERN RECOGNITION SURE IS MAKING Set You Free look like a fool! I just love't! With ease and grace, PR elegantly swats fly ball zingers back at Set You Free, who gets more and more lame with each reply. It is very entertaining. There are so many clowns here to entertain me! LOL!
Posted by: ROGER | 2008-04-07 2:46:19 PM
Roger, don't be a dick.
I don't consider anyone here a "clown". I strongly disagree with SYF and I'm willing to point out contradictions, but I'm not cool with putting people down like that.
Posted by: Pattern Recognition | 2008-04-07 2:52:13 PM
LOL! Pattern Recognition, keep up the entertainment! I enjoy laughing at these clowns and whether you like it or not, it is a great show! You do not get to choose the audience. Nice huh. LOL!
Posted by: ROGER | 2008-04-07 3:19:54 PM
PR:
May I recommend an anger management course for you?
Posted by: set you free | 2008-04-07 4:17:46 PM
Tom Lukiwski is the real face of the Harper CONs--full of homophobia in private while full of phony remorse for their hate in public. More of their hidden agenda of hate and neaderthal views.
Posted by: ROGER | 2008-04-07 4:47:53 PM
Roger,
You're like the old Liberal goalie who gets up in the House of Commons every day and drones on and on and on about his fantasies.
His excuse is that wearing a mask while stopping pucks didn't prevent him from looking like an idiot.
What's yours?
Posted by: bocanut | 2008-04-07 8:08:28 PM
bocanut:
There's a good reason nobody listens to buffoons like ROGER and Pattern Recognition.
The people who have to deal with them don't like them and they believe they're entitled to be liked.
Poor sots. They know so much about others but nothing about themselves.
If they actually had to look in a mirror, if they ever came to the truth that they are the authors of their own misfortunes, even they would not like what they saw.
Posted by: set you free | 2008-04-07 8:14:14 PM
Roger , you are some horrid reincarnation of the old Ayckroyd - Belushi characters , the famous wild and crazy guys from Chechzlovakia . I seem to remember you from a bunch of postings about a year or so back ; your English has improved a bit but you`re still crazy as a shit house rat.
Posted by: daveh | 2008-04-07 9:50:39 PM
Tom Likiwski speaks to the real thinking of the Harper CONservatives on matters of respect for fellow citizens. In Tom and Steve's world, there is no decency or civility. Just watch Harper snarling in the House of Commons, viciously flinging innuendo for personal political gain. These people are morally and ethically unfit to govern Canada. And that is no laughing matter.
Posted by: ROGER | 2008-04-08 12:03:07 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.