Western Standard

The Shotgun Blog

« Poll shows majority believe the criminal offence of polygamy trumps freedom of religion | Main | Bob Rae, the gift that keeps on giving »

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Deport This Man, Today

Naeem Muhammad Khan has a Facebook account.  He lives in Toronto.  He is unemployed.  He’s also an avid Jihadist who arrived in this country less than two years ago.

Why is he still here?

While this nation is at war, he posts a banner on his Facebook page encouraging support for the Taliban and al-Qaeda.  He says that Osama Bin Laden is a “hero.”  He says that the reason that he’s here is because he’s free here to preach the Jihadist creed in a way that he wouldn’t be in most of the Moslem world.

Why is he still here?

The man is of no value to this country.  Given that he is unemployed, he is a drain on the Treasury.  He is worthless.  He is scum.  If we were a culture with the self-confidence to do what is morally right we would…  Well, I’ll stop there – lest I draw the scrutiny of the self-appointed defenders of the “rights” of our murderous enemies.

If you want to know why I have so little regard for this nation’s government, even under the present Administration, take a look at this man.  A nation so degraded, so enervated, that it cannot properly dispose of as odious a “man” as this isn’t worthy of respect.  A nation whose people so happily accept such a state of affairs is, in the words of Alexander Hamilton, “prepared for a master – and deserves one.”

So, I’m issuing a challenge to the Immigration Minister, Diane Finley.  One that I am hoping that others will pick up and echo: deport this man, today.

I realize that government doesn’t normally move at that pace.  But, of course, if can – if the appropriate fire is lit.  I am calling on the Immigration Minister – and for that matter the Prime Minister – to make people jump.  Go.  Arrest this man.  Put him on a plane.  Send him back to Pakistan.  There are other courses of action which would also be morally right and emotionally satisfying, but this one happens to be legal, so I’ll settle for that.

Prove me wrong.  Show me that this is still a country.  Tell the world that this is something more than an international flop-house for terrorists, criminals, the shiftless, and other assorted miscreants.  Honour those who do come here to make better lives by removing from their presence – as well as ours – such a wretched creature.

Not that I believe that they will.  As I have said before, this country is too far-gone for that.  Even under this, supposedly right-wing government, we don’t have the guts to face down the left.  Even if they did summon the courage to do something, he’d probably win in some damned court and be back here in a few years with $25 Million and an apology.

Speaking of odious individuals with a Facebook page, have you ever wondered what happened to Abdulkareem Khadr, the member of the famed Khadr al-Qaeda family who was badly wounded in a shoot-out with Pakistani forces where his father, a senior member of al-Qaeda, was killed?

Yes, for the record, the man I linked to is one and the same.  I corresponded with him briefly in the past, before he, if I were to guess, probably Googled my name and guessed that my intentions towards him were other-than-benign.  This member of the self-proclaimed al-Qaeda family, wounded while on the other side of the war that we are fighting, would seem to have spent the last few years enjoying the full benefits of my tax dollars – recovering his health through our health care system.  He attends Birchmount Park Collegiate in Toronto, where he is scheduled to graduate in a few months.  I’ll note that it’s a public school, as well.  Given his family’s unique background and that his father is dead, one wonders how they support themselves.  It wouldn’t be shocking to find that the boy is a leech on the taxpaying public in a third way as well.

He would seem to have friends.  One supposes that they’re ignorant or – given his notoriety it seems difficult to believe that they would be – they, like to many people in this country, view being on the other side as simply another lifestyle choice.  I thought about going up and down the list and asking the people if they know that they’re linked with Canada’s al-Qaeda family but, in the end, that would seem to be an empty exercise.  In all probability those people are lost just as this country is lost.

If no one in this country could rouse themselves to act against him – and the rest of his family – than Khan is probably perfectly safe.  One more step towards all of our graves.

As I have said before, leftism is AIDS for civilization.  All of that touchy-feely nonsense, all of those false doctrines – none of them is fatal in and of themselves.  Socialism is difficult to counter because, on the surface, the proposals are not directly harmful.  But, like HIV/AIDS, leftism attacks the immune system and wrecked the ability of the body to defend itself from what, under normal circumstances, would be minor irritants. 

Can this country be saved?  Not, I think, without a drastic change.  If our leaders – if our Conservative leaders – cannot rise to such a simple and obvious challenge, than how shall we ever save ourselves?  We’ll just continue our long process of bleeding out under the Liberals being alternated with the tourniquet of the Conservatives. 

Indeed, we lack even the hope of other endangered lands – such as France – that we might, in an hour of supreme emergency, turn back to other, darker traditions.  We are already too weak and divided for that.  Instead, our hopes must rest upon events – that some event or individual will bring about an awakening in this country which may once again give us the hope of brighter days. 

Posted by Adam T. Yoshida on April 27, 2008 in Canadian Politics | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Deport This Man, Today:


Please read more carefully. The person calling for violence is ROGER...UBER TROLL.

Please don't lecture the rest of us and insist we settle down.

Posted by: h2o273kk9 | 2008-04-28 6:11:59 PM

"we're at war, nobody really knows against whom or what, but it's a war."

I'm sure our armed forces fighting and dying in another land would be interested in hearing another leftist whack job tell them they are not at war, and they don't know who the enemy is.

The abject stupidity of the enemy enablers like you never ceases to amaze me.

Posted by: deepblue | 2008-04-28 6:33:01 PM


"The abject stupidity of the enemy enablers like you never ceases to amaze me."

But Snowy said

"we're at war, nobody really knows against whom or what, but it's a war."

Actually, WE know who is the enemy. It's the Snowy's who are having problems deciding upon Molotov or Ribbentrop.

Posted by: h2o273kk9 | 2008-04-28 6:38:38 PM

Sorry to dissappoint anyone, but my projection is not all that exaggerated. Especially during this cold weather.

I think someone may have misunderstood my definition of "out there". I realize that my immediate surroundings are fairly safe, except on tuesdays and thursdays. I'd like to keep it that way as long as possible. That's why I think we need to be pro-active in keeping internal threats under control. This person actually recommended posting a be-heading on youtube. How would you like to be the first western country to have that filmed on your home soil?

Posted by: dp | 2008-04-28 6:48:26 PM


"This person actually recommended posting a be-heading on youtube. How would you like to be the first western country to have that filmed on your home soil?"

Don't be so naive. The immediate response to your question would be to have some ALLEGED "death penalty opponent" equate a beheading with a lethal injection.

You know it is true. I know it is true. Snowy knows it is true.

Posted by: h2o273kk9 | 2008-04-28 7:01:30 PM


"This person actually recommended posting a be-heading on youtube. How would you like to be the first western country to have that filmed on your home soil?"

Don't be so naive. The immediate response to your question would be to have some ALLEGED "death penalty opponent" equate a beheading with a lethal injection.

You know it is true. I know it is true. Snowy knows it is true.

Posted by: h2o273kk9 | 2008-04-28 7:02:35 PM

Was that a freudian slip. Liberal with a capital L...as in Liberal party?

Posted by: h2o273kk9 | 28-Apr-08 5:43:33 PM

Not at all. You're showing your colours, and I think they are red.

Posted by: Snowrunner | 2008-04-28 7:33:26 PM

What's with your exaggerated projections like the one you just ascribed to me wanting raise taxes if I'm not careful?

Posted by: h2o273kk9 | 28-Apr-08 5:38:57 PM

I suggest you go back and read what I wrote again, the only thing being "projected" here is your usual attempt at pissing at my leg and failing miserable in the process. But keep going, sooner or later you may get lucky.

Posted by: Snowrunner | 2008-04-28 7:36:27 PM

I'm sure our armed forces fighting and dying in another land would be interested in hearing another leftist whack job tell them they are not at war, and they don't know who the enemy is.

Posted by: deepblue | 28-Apr-08 6:33:01 PM

By the standards of the Civilized World (aka THE WEST(TM)) no war was declared against another Government. IF you want to consider the terrorist attack on NYC and Washington DC an act of war then the question would be why the heck is:

a.) Why is Canada involved.
b.) Why has the Canadian Government never declared war (did it pass in the House of Commons? Not that I am aware of)
c.) Canadian Troops are in Afghanistan instead of Saudi Arabia where most of the Terrorists came from.

If none of this really scratches your itch the only conclusion left on why Canada is in a War is that it participated in an Aggression War, you know, like Hitler when he invaded Poland, which according to International law would actually mean someone needs to put Canada into it's place.

Which poision pill would you like to swallow?

I know I know deepblue, these pesky laws really suck, Adam proves it with his kneejerk reaction on this blog every couple of days when he advocates to throw out our laws for people he doesn't like so I guess technically on this blog there is a third option:

"It's a war because I say it is, and it is a just war because I say it is"


The abject stupidity of the enemy enablers like you never ceases to amaze me.

Posted by: deepblue | 28-Apr-08 6:33:01 PM

I know this is going to be difficult for you, but please explain to me exactly what Canada supposely fights for. Freedom? Democracy? Rule of Law? I guess right after we've thrown them all out because they are somewhat standing in the way to wage the war that you seem to want to fight so desperately.

Go, play a sport, maybe that's getting all the aggression out of you.

Posted by: Snowrunner | 2008-04-28 7:42:15 PM

How would you like to be the first western country to have that filmed on your home soil?

Posted by: dp | 28-Apr-08 6:48:26 PM

Good point. So how can me make the best use of the military to prevent this from happening? We're in a war after all and that's what the military does best: Fight wars even if their spiffy commercials lately seem to be all about some humanitarian (aka leftist) efforts.

Posted by: Snowrunner | 2008-04-28 7:49:53 PM

Canada fights wars to prevent being taken over by tyrannical, foreign racists and bigots. Canada is losing this world war.

Posted by: dewp | 2008-04-28 7:57:16 PM

Oh, and just for "comedic effect":


Posted by: Snowrunner | 2008-04-28 7:59:22 PM

"I think many crime victims, including people who were killed, could have avoided trouble if they’d had the moral clarity that racist humor provides."

The moral clarity that racist humor provides??? Are you serious, DJ? I just...I don't even know what to say to that. To insinuate that it's better to assume that a racial minority is about to rape and/or kill me rather than give everyone the equal benefit of the doubt is by far the most offensive thing I've heard in a long time. I would not live my life as that kind of paranoid, hateful person for anything in the world. And despite dp's assumption - no, my life is not at all 'sheltered'. I just refuse to take a few isolated incidences of violence and allow them to dictate my whole life.

"Angela strikes me as weird, with all due respect. Why is she standing up for someone who has said he'd like to kill people like her (i.e., all who are not fundamentalist Islamists)? Khan and his positions are completely indefensible, Angela. I hope you'll never have to pay the price for your short-sightedness."

Weird, eh? Well, certainly not the worst thing I've heard this week.
A few points:
- This person, as far as I know, did not say he wanted to kill people like me. I think he pointed out that, under Sharia law, the penalty for apostasy and insulting Islam is death. This is true (and no - I'm not defending Sharia either)
- If this person did break a law, then by all means he should be (and probably will be) arrested. So relax.
- In any case it doesn't matter because I'm not defending a person, I'm defending the idea that in Canada everyone gets the benefit of the rule of law.

As for "paying the price" for my "short-sightedness", I'm not too worried, Werner. As far as I'm concerned, the people who live in hatred, fear and paranoia are already paying a far greater price than I ever will.

Posted by: Angela | 2008-04-28 8:26:52 PM

Angela, dont bother arguing with these losers, they will spew their retardedness untill Alberta becomes an all white, all Christian, U.S. State, (with Ezra as a telivision mascot for them).

Posted by: James | 2008-04-28 8:44:42 PM

"As far as I'm concerned, the people who live in hatred, fear and paranoia are already paying a far greater price than I ever will."

Posted by: Angela | 28-Apr-08 8:26:52 PM

How right you are. You will pay no price. I could sense that right off.

All people, of all races are driven by those three basic realities. In fact all species are driven by these forces. It's the fire that keeps us going. It's why herd animals have monocular vision. It's why mother cats kill weasels. It's why crows harass owls. It's why lions hate hyenas, and on, and on.

The only creatures with the luxury of opting out of this cycle of life are the ones with no plans to contribute.

And James, thanks for the vote of confidence.

Posted by: dp | 2008-04-28 9:19:25 PM


I like James idea of Alberta becoming a US state.

Far as I know, there's no such thing as equalization payments in the land of the free and home of the brave.

B.C. and Saskatchewan are welcome to come along.

Once we all leave though, who's going to look after Whinerland?

Posted by: set you free | 2008-04-28 9:28:37 PM

"Journalists and even the police have been so intimidated by charges of racism that it is nearly impossible to report on the extent of black crime in Quebec. In one notorious case last fall, police arrested hundreds of Haitians who had forced women into a huge prostitution business. The women invariably white—were treated abominably. Some were branded like cattle. Others were forced to eat their own menstrual tampons. Some of the Haitians liked to shove a gun barrel up a woman's vagina and threaten to shoot her."

You're lost in all these notes, DJ ?
Some Haitian gangs just took the place left from the Hells Angels after the huge "Carcajou" operation. Before them, Italians and the Dubois brothers were running the Sex Show.

Prostitution has never been the perfect job and you're not gonna make me cry for girls that would accept anything for the next baggie.

A lot of Haitians paticipate positivly in our society and playing funny with numbers to comfort yourself in your beleifs is not fair.

This said, I will keep enjoying your futur interventions.

Posted by: Marc | 2008-04-28 9:32:52 PM


Poor James thought he was throwing an insult.

Hey Marc, that's kind of mean. Didn't you know prostitutes are victims?

I've heard people from Halifax say they wish they had the hell's angels back, because the asian gangs that took over are more violent. In my opinion, the sicilians had the least impact on innocent by-standers. All the others seem to have a bad habit of threatening families and children.

Posted by: dp | 2008-04-28 9:42:43 PM

I love Haitians. I just don't want to live near the many, many bad ones. [This subject has been beaten to death. We are doomed, so get on with living.]

Posted by: dewp | 2008-04-28 9:45:48 PM


It's a good thing we're not easily offended.

Posted by: set you free | 2008-04-28 9:54:29 PM

The worst of them all, dp, are Quebecers.
We eat our children and sell our women for a 12 pack and hockey tickets.
Or is it we eat our woman and sell our children ?

Anyway, when you'll move to Québec, you and me will go for one of our many "places of charms".
Your wallet will be the only "victim".

Posted by: Marc | 2008-04-28 10:00:36 PM

Marc: Maybe you should take dp to Philly...that way you can catch a hockey game too. I hear the golf courses are about to get real busy in Montreal... :) Sorry...cheap shot, I know.

Posted by: Markalta | 2008-04-28 11:11:43 PM

Ho-leeeeeeeeeeeeee jimineeee!!! This site is sure chock full of fearful panicky chickenhawk conservatives. "people are free to think what they want, but not when they 'radicalize' their 'followers'". "bloody china up"? What kind of chicken sh*t, chickenhawk website IS this?!?

I am aethiest, but have no problem with people subscribing to whatever religion works for them. Even Islam. And as a matter of absolute principle, enshrined even in the US Constitution, the Taliban or any other armed Afghan insurgency has EVERY right to kill as many foreign invading soldiers as they can. Not only a right, but a duty.

Canada is still somewhat free, even though we invade other countries on whims and lies and phony dedication to some abstraction called "democracy". So then anybody has the right to be Muslim and cheer on the Taliban. We all sure cheered the Taliban/mujahideen when they were killing Russkies. Many of us cheered Poles -- and yes, there was violence -- in their fight to free themselves from the USSR. Some of us cheered elements of the IRA in their fight against the British Empire, and some of us were even British!!

The fear, foolishness, and hypocrisy expressed on this site is serioiusly AWFUL. Bloody China up, eh, Yoshida? You first, you little neocon fart catcher!

Posted by: Hernando | 2008-04-28 11:24:15 PM

You're not funny, Sir.
They're gonna win in six.

Posted by: Marc | 2008-04-29 12:29:15 AM

The predators walking among us

"In June 2006 Tracy Hilliard of Las Vegas was walking home from the store with her 13-year-old daughter. Two young black men approached, and the girl became nervous. But Hilliard, as she later testified, told her daughter not to prejudge people.

At that moment, one of the young men said he was going to rob her. One of the assailants pulled out a .38-caliber handgun, pointed it at the mother and daughter, and then shot Hilliard twice in the back."

"On Friday April 4 at 9 p.m., a Columbia University graduate student, Ming-Hui Yu, was waiting for a bus as 122nd Street and Broadway when he was attacked by two "juveniles"...

The victim refused to give up his belongings, and the two attackers starting punching and kicking him, cops said. That's when he tried to flee, running diagonally across Broadway toward 121st St.

"It was just horrible, horrible," said John Stathis, 57, a plumbing contractor from Queens who has a shop nearby. "The guy's body was twisted like a pretzel."

Victor Bradley, 21, a security guard from the Bronx, said he ran toward the sound of a loud boom.

"The guy was bleeding from the nose," Bradley said. "I can't even put it in words."

It's clearly documented by the FBI that black crime is hugely disproportionate to the black portion of population. It's also long documented that black-on-white crime is overwhelmingly dominated by blacks. Still, an argument is made that the nummber of criminals are small compared to the whole population. The problem is how do you divide the "bad" from the "good" even when the bad is a small portion of the whole? What resources were available to Tracy Hilliard or Ming-Hui Yu that enabled them to make that decision? Hilliard chose the liberal PC doctrine: "I would not live my life as that kind of paranoid, hateful person for anything in the world." Not even to save her own life or the life of her daughter? She chose to believe in the holy PC scripture and paid a dear price.

These are the sacrificial lambs, given up to the most holy of holy liberal god, political correctness. The morality of race realism is evident. It enhances survival and survival is virtuous. As dp suggests, it is a fundamental principle of evolution.

Posted by: DJ | 2008-04-29 1:03:43 AM

I took your wisdom to heart, DJ. Last night as I was walking home from work, a black man came up behind me and tried to talk to me. So I maced him. It turned out he only wanted to know what time it was, but better safe than sorry, right? I stand by my decision.

I'm going to bow out of this conversation now. Carry on with the fear-mongering if it makes you feel better.

Posted by: Angela | 2008-04-29 7:10:10 AM

Fabricating stories doesn't add to the debate.

Posted by: Liz J | 2008-04-29 8:34:34 AM


On Saturday afternoon my son and I drove onto a first nations reserve for a sporting event. We got lost for a few minutes, before finding the venue. We made a couple of jokes about the possibility of turning up missing. We met with some very nice people from the reserve, and were very well treated. We made a few friends, and would be happy to return for another event.

After the event we left the area immediately, not stopping for anything until we got back to the highway. On the drive home we had a long talk about the horrible treatment of aboriginals, and the difficulty of getting past the centuries of cultural conflict.

My son learned a few things on this trip. He learned that racial distrust is a reality. He learned that some minorities have a legitimate reason for hating us. He learned that an exit strategy is essential when attempting to bridge the gap between cultures.

This is not a fabrication. This is real life. I have many aboriginal friends, but that doesn't mean I'm going to walk up to a group of "Indian Posse" youths, and ask for directions. My kids know better than to sit in the Jamaican section of the foodcourt. They know not to go to Sunridge Mall to buy jeans. They aren't bigots.

Posted by: dp | 2008-04-29 12:00:29 PM

More "lets serve Israel's interestes" masquerading as "let save western civilization"

Some of the stuff you write about Muslims reminds me of the stuff the Nazis wrote about Jews. Sieg Heil Fuhrer Adam.

Posted by: antinazi | 2008-04-29 5:58:01 PM

antinazi sees a comparison between the nazis and muslims. No surprise there, except, I would categorize more as jihadists, rather than muslims. I know some very nice muslims, which I would not compare to nazis, however antinazi does make a good point about the similarities between jihadists and nazis. Good job antinazi, you are very observant!

Posted by: Markalta | 2008-04-30 11:18:24 AM


I would agree with your analysis.

National Socialists, like the militant Muslims, use an eerily similar technique of murdering those who disagree with them.

Curiously, both worldviews have a Master Race element to their philosophies.

Posted by: set you free | 2008-04-30 11:30:07 AM

SYF: The Nazis were supported by the Grand Mufti (some big whig camel jockey) when they were trying to exterminate the Jews, and the current jihadists are very similar to the nazis except they not only want to rid the world of Jews, but all non-muslims.

Gee, wonder why antinazi hasn't responded. Guess he didn't realize what a profound statement he actually made.

Posted by: Markalta | 2008-05-01 8:10:23 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.