Western Standard

The Shotgun Blog

« Bhutto Assassination | Main | The Income Trust 300 »

Thursday, December 27, 2007

Bhutto assassination was an al Qaeda hit

According to Bill Roggio, Ayman al-Zawahiri ordered it himself.

FWIW, I whipped up a quick primer on recent Pakistani history (complete with Mark Steyn quote).

Posted by D.J. McGuire on December 27, 2007 in International Affairs | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b5d69e200e54fc7b4d68834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bhutto assassination was an al Qaeda hit:

Comments

If you read the comments on CTV's site on this subject, don't be shocked to see how many attribute this murder to the US and George W. in particular.

Typical Leftoid knee-jerk reaction.

Now that Al Qaida has claimed responsibility, don't hold your breath while awaiting Leftoid apologies.

Posted by: obc | 2007-12-27 12:26:58 PM


Some reports got it wrong. Popeye didn't assassinate Bluto.

http://tinyurl.com/3dyqzw

Posted by: John West | 2007-12-27 12:28:23 PM


"America symbolizes modernity, diversity and democracy, and it is these three things which are the fanatics´ worst fears"

More here:
http://www.johannorberg.net/?page=displayblog&month=12&year=2007#2496

Posted by: Johan i Kanada | 2007-12-27 3:07:02 PM


Please be reasonable folks,the religion of peace would never,ever,use suicide bombers to further the islamfication of the world. Right? I wonder if the rageheads will be staging 48 hour hunger strikes around the world to protest this violence against women.

Posted by: wallyj | 2007-12-27 3:37:04 PM


Bhutto claimed she was safe because any Muslim that attacks a woman is destined for hell.

HUH? This after that imam a few months ago instructed husbands on how to beat their wives with sticks!

One of these two experts on Islam was wrong - and one is now dead!

Posted by: obc | 2007-12-27 3:56:02 PM


There are so many 'experts' on the religion of Islam and none seem to have the definition of what it's truly all about.
Aside from attacking and killing for a myriad of reasons, depending on what displeases the theocratic hierarchy at any given time and place,it's the world's biggest, most dangerous mess wherever it has power and/or influence.
No matter, it's a religion of total contradiction at every angle, calling itself a religion of peace is the ultimate oxymoron.

It appears interpretors of the religion have enabled a useful tool, extremism, to aid their ultimate goal of world supremacy, purposely set up to confuse both those who are in it and those who are dealing with the results of it's brainwashing through lies and propaganda.

Posted by: Liz J | 2007-12-27 5:38:37 PM


Maybe Musharaff had a stake in Bhutto's tragic end? Ever think about that?

Posted by: Cynic | 2007-12-27 11:44:18 PM


No - but I had a steak in a restaurant yesterday!

Posted by: obc | 2007-12-28 7:58:57 AM


News flash: Bhutto's death a tragic accident.

Apparently while dodging a hail of gunfire and trying to shield herself from a human bomb she bumped her head on a defective sunroof.

This should be a lesson to anyone who sticks his head out of a moving vehicle.

Posted by: dp | 2007-12-28 2:02:59 PM


Good for you obc. Perhaps you can fill us in on what you have for breakfast tomorrow. Douchebag.

Posted by: cynic | 2007-12-29 12:26:01 AM


Hey - don't question me! I slept in a Holiday Inn Express last night.

Posted by: obc | 2007-12-29 6:48:08 AM


Bluto's dealth was tragic and a big loss to many but also an advantage and sad relife to others, what are the pros and cons here? well i guess they knew she was strong and they were affraid that she would win the election and i quess they didnt whant that. Lifes not fair, we have to make our own luck in this world and remember to never give up becuase everything happens for a reason.

Posted by: Mariah | 2008-01-23 9:02:53 PM



The comments to this entry are closed.