Western Standard

The Shotgun Blog

« Christian "terrorist cell" makes trouble; Muslims respond | Main | I have seen the light »

Saturday, April 28, 2007

Jason Kenney demands action from Stephane Dion

Dion Needs to Denounce or Fire Violent, Extremist Liberal Candidate

EDMONTON – Jason Kenney, Conservative Member of Parliament today demanded that Stéphane Dion denounce or fire Farhan Mujahid Chak as the nominated Liberal candidate for Edmonton – Mill Woods – Beaumont.

Chak was also Stéphane Dion's Edmonton Campaign Manager for his 2006 Liberal Leadership Campaign.

In 1993 a Farhan Mujahid Chak, then 19 was arrested for firing a shotgun into a popular Edmonton nightclub.

"Stéphane Dion should show some leadership and come clean about the background of Farhan Mujahid Chak," said Kenney. "Has Stéphane Dion ever raised questions about the background of Farhan Mujahid Chak?"

In 1999, Mr. Chak wrote a letter to the Edmonton Journal accusing India of "grotesque human rights violations." The next year, he claimed that India is not a free country.

In 2000, Mr. Chak referred to then-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon as a "butcher", accused Israel of "terrorism, massacres and savagery" and even "the pillage, the rape and the enslavement of an entire population."

In a 2002 article for an American Islamic publication, Mr. Chak suggested that terrorist attacks within France were not committed by Algerian Islamists, but rather by "unseen hands" including "such co-conspirators as the French government."

Last year, Mr. Chak even threw baseless charges of "exclusiveness, racial superiority, injustice and arrogance" at the new Conservative government in a local Polish publication. Mr. Chak added that Canada was "trying to destabilize Poland" through its foreign aid programs.

"Erratic behavior and extremism have no place in Canadian politics, and yet the Liberals have nominated an individual who appears to be guilty of both," said Kenney. "It's time for Stéphane Dion to come clean and tell the Canadian people whether or not gun violence and political extremism have a home in the Liberal Party of Canada."

Posted by Steve Janke on April 28, 2007 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b5d69e200d834aa6ff753ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Jason Kenney demands action from Stephane Dion:

Comments

"Also, you should change "UN pals" to "U.S. pals"."

No, I'll stick to what I said. It's the UN officials who are dining high on the hog whenever they have "meetings" all ove the world, while their "peacem keeping" soldiers are raping male & female children while on duty.

Posted by: obc | 2007-04-29 8:29:31 PM


Here we go again. Another righty attempting to justify Afghanistan by saying that we are there to help the people. IF that was the case, why are we not in the Sudan? Or East Timore, or Niger etc. We are fighting a war for the US, a war that is of no concern to us. Our soldiers have already died for naught. You ask what I would do about terrorism? My answer is nothing. We did not start it and we did not encourage it, and we should have nothing to do with it. If you are so concerned about protecting the US, then I'm sure they have lots of room for you to go to Iraq. But I suppose you won't because that would involve getting off your couch.

Posted by: lefty_99 | 2007-04-29 8:33:47 PM


Hey Lefty:

Your beloved BBC is reporting on cow flatulence and the EU! HA!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/1791955.stm

Posted by: obc | 2007-04-29 8:35:35 PM


OMG obc, you say the most ridiculous things. Are you sure you're not H2O's child?

Posted by: lefty_99 | 2007-04-29 8:35:44 PM


No, he's mine.

Posted by: obc | 2007-04-29 8:37:54 PM


lefty
"You ask what I would do about terrorism? "

Think of all the CO2 being emitted by those suicide bombers. Don't you care?

" But I suppose you won't because that would involve getting off your couch."

Again, the transportation of all the supporters to Iraq would add too much CO2 to the atmosphere.

Posted by: h2o273kk9 | 2007-04-29 8:39:39 PM


. . . but no response to the BBC article, of course.

Posted by: obc | 2007-04-29 8:39:45 PM


So what about the article, obc? I already read that in the Sun yesterday so its old news now.

Oh H2O, so pathetic, so desperate to win an arguement.

Posted by: lefty_99 | 2007-04-29 8:44:07 PM


lefty: Do you not hear about the terrorism in Britain, Spain, Turkey, Sudan, Nigeria, Indonesia, etc. etc.

Also, maybe you missed the goons in Ontario plotting terrorism and the beheading of our PM? Yeah, we should just forget about it, it's just a U.S. conspiracy, anyway, huh?

Posted by: MarkAlta | 2007-04-29 8:45:42 PM


lefty,
Who's trying to win an argument? I'm asking you to consider the ramifications of your actions and proposals.

They are YOUR words, aren't they?

Posted by: h2o273kk9 | 2007-04-29 8:46:04 PM


So what? You claimed that no one says cow flatulence contributes to global warming. Now even your beloved BBC is reporting it. But Liberals are never wrong, even when proven to be. That's why there's no point in having a rational discussion with them.

Posted by: obc | 2007-04-29 8:46:59 PM


BREAKING NEWS ! ! !

"How to save the planet? More nuclear power
and GM crops, say climate experts"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/1791955.stm

Oh, no! Some Leftoid heads are going to spin!

Posted by: obc | 2007-04-29 8:50:22 PM


Hmm, decapitating the PM eh? Maybe these terrorists are on to something here.

Posted by: lefty_99 | 2007-04-29 8:51:59 PM


I'm turning off my computer now. I figure Lefty and I killed a couple of Africans this evening by emitting CO2 through our electrical use and I'm starting to feel guilty.

I hope he will do likewise and lead by example.

Posted by: h2o273kk9 | 2007-04-29 8:53:22 PM


What these Leftoids don't understand is that they too are on the list to be decapitated if and when the Jihadists get the chance.

Posted by: obc | 2007-04-29 8:54:21 PM


Lizj (lefty) said it best.

PS: Do any Con-servatives know if Canada is getting back that billion dollars from the 'soft'wood Emerson deal that Harper slapped together over a weekend? One can only imagine what BC could do with that Harper luv offering to Uncle Bush.

Posted by: public flogger | 2007-04-30 1:04:14 AM


pf:

Were you happier where there was no deal.

Are you ever happy?

Posted by: Set you free | 2007-04-30 9:08:17 AM


public flogger,

What a rediculous name you chose for yourself.

I hear there is a demand for public floggers in the taliban. They use them on children and women.

Figures!

You and what you worship, aka iggies of the world, can go join them.

Oh of course, that would require you think for longer than a moment, about what the heck you support.

Right, with your addh attention span I am certain that you will be as gone as you are here for the moment.

By the time you finish reading this, you will have forgotten where it all began -- two seconds ago.

Do you prefer a bull whip or a cat-o-nine tails?

Or rocks and molotov cocktails?

Perhaps you dream of the stuff that exists in the vision and mission of the taliban?

Talk about cons?

You and your party of lies, take the cake.

I suppose the interest off the ad scam is still lining your pockets, while presenting you with copious quantities of time, to display your "cow"-ardness to the world.

Oh dear, the Lady has been naughty.

Do not worry. I will not be seeking your attention for any atonement, any time soon.

Posted by: Lady | 2007-04-30 2:09:46 PM



The comments to this entry are closed.