Western Standard

The Shotgun Blog

« Separation of state . . . and health care | Main | I become arrogant and offer advice to an entire movement »

Thursday, September 29, 2005

My Prediction:
The CBC Will Settle Soon

As I have posted several times before, I have been delighted with the current CBC lockout. The only thing that would improve it would be having a manager announce the titles and performers of music that is being played both before and after it is played. But I think this slice of near-heaven is doomed for two reasons:

First, if management has any sense, they will realize that most CBC listeners/viewers do not really miss the CBC. From Michael Campbell, p C03, of the Sept. 29th Vancouvre Sun [h/t to JAK]:

Day 46 and the CBC is still out, but the country's holding together. Is there any limit to the resilience of the Canadian public?

You'll have to forgive me (of course, friends of the CBC won't), but the passionate supporters of the national broadcaster have always been over the top in couching the CBC as the glue that holds the nation together. For some, it's the primary rationale for the nearly $1 billion that taxpayers pay to support the public broadcaster.

To be more precise, according to the latest budget documents, Canadian taxpayers spend about $2.7 million per day to subsidize the CBC, which works out to $982.4 million a year (up from $702 million in 1997). It's this level of spending, combined with low ratings for the CBC's English-language television, that has many people asking whether taxpayers are getting their money's worth.

And if nobody misses the CBC, what is the point of subsidizing it to the tune of $47quadzillion? CBC managers should soon become concerned about whether a different set of politicians might vote to privatize the broadcaster and remove its subsidy because, if that were to happen, many of them would be looking for new jobs.

Second, the NHL is about to begin regular-season play. Hockey night in Canada has been a major revenue source for the CBC, and if they are unable to present hockey in its full glory, if at all, they will suffer both short-term revenue losses and long-term reliability concerns: the NHL could easily strike new deals with the other networks to provide even more hockey than those other outlets already provide, and the CBC could be left on the outside.

The expectation of this possible loss of revenue, in both the short term and long term, gives the members of the guild a stronger hand in bargaining now than they had a month ago. Management has presented a new offer to the Guild.

CBC management made what it described as "significant compromises" yesterday on several contentious issues, particularly new limits on the number of contract workers it would hire per year, in order to end its labour dispute.

However, the Canadian Media Guild, which represents the 5,500 locked-out CBC staff who have been walking on picket lines throughout Canada for seven weeks, called management's settlement offer only a small step toward ending the dispute.

My point estimate is that they will settle by mid-October. Here is hoping I am wrong. But if I am correct, here is hoping it is not for the wrong reason [$ subscription required]:

Heavyweight Liberal MPs called for an overhaul of the CBC management and an end to the labour law that allows the crown corporation to lock out staffers as management put a new offer on the table last night.

I had been impressed, up 'til now, that Liberal and NDP politicians have not become more involved on the side of the Media Guild. But this is something we do not need: MPs declaring the CBC a sacrosanct employer that must not be allowed to lock out its workers.

Posted by EclectEcon on September 29, 2005 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b5d69e200d8348ea63e69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference My Prediction:
The CBC Will Settle Soon
:

Comments

Funny, I thought I was the only one that felt that way about the CBC strike!

I regret to announce that CTV seems to have taken up the task of filling in for the lack of prejudicial annoyances that CBC likes to spout. Perhaps they're not true CTVers, but freelancers that will just turn to parasitize the next available host when the government pig CBC withers up and blows away?

Perish the thought about HNiC going down with the CBC! Really! Let the nation burn to the ground, but Don Cherry can NEVER die!

Of course, there are more Californians than Canadians, so we don't really have that much control of the NHL, let alone it's broadcasts, for that matter! But someone will pick up the slack in hockey broadcasts (hopefully with Cherry annoying all the right people) 'cause it's an established market, isn't it?

But you know, the silence of the CBC is sweet. Endless rebroadcasts of Antiques Roadshow with BBC World News fill the void quite nicely. Why would anybody want them to settle? -dwm-

Posted by: David Millar | 2005-09-29 8:55:50 PM


The CBC will settle soon because the Liberals need the network to work its anti-Conservative magic during the next election.

Posted by: Fred | 2005-09-29 10:31:20 PM


WHAT ABOUT THE POOR CAMERAMAN STRUGLING BY ON 60 OR IS IT 100K A YEAR. SHOULDN'T WE BE WILLING TO PAY ANYTHING TO SAVE HIM OR HER FROM HAVING TO GET A REAL JOB?

Posted by: JACK | 2005-09-30 12:25:26 AM


It is very straightforward. The CBC, like the UN, is long past usefulness. Remove this albatross from around our collective necks.

Posted by: bob mcginnis | 2005-09-30 1:54:58 AM


I'd like to see the CBC rumble like that movie anchorman.

Posted by: underemployed buddha | 2005-09-30 2:29:36 AM


might I suggest a THIRD reason why the strike will be settled soon - there is a possible election coming up and the Liberals will need their propoganda machine. Of course they always have their backup at CTV if things don't work out at the bargaining table.

Posted by: John Brown | 2005-09-30 9:04:34 AM


I agree with Fred and John. The CBC is the Liberal party mouthpiece and will be essential if an election is in our near future.

Posted by: Peter | 2005-09-30 2:09:32 PM


heav·y·weight n. 1. One of above average weight. 2. A boxer in the heaviest weight division (see punch·drunk). 3. A great burden; anchor.

Posted by: Justzumgai | 2005-09-30 9:14:40 PM


The CbC is like a toothache - you never miss the agrivation once it is gone but when you have it it occupies your thoughts in a active negative way; even when sleeping.

Posted by: jema54 | 2005-10-01 11:30:26 AM


I made the mistake of announcing to an art gallery group (of which I am a member) that I was delighted with the CBC strike. They expressed shock and amazement that I don't miss the CBC and would actually be pleased to see it gone. What on earth am I doing in that group??

Posted by: The Eclectic Econoclast | 2005-10-01 7:43:04 PM


Geeze, The CBC is on strike? Had no idea!
Guess it's time to revamp and get rid of some Hacks, separate the wheat from the chaff.

Posted by: Liz J | 2006-11-06 5:57:14 AM


Google Stillstand? Seit gut einer Woche taucht kein einziger Artikel, den wir schreiben, in den Index aufgenommen. Hat jemand ahnliche Erfahrungen? Normalerweise dauert das nur 1-2 Tage bis Google die Artikel im Index auffuhrt. Gehts es anderen auch so?

Posted by: alarm | 2007-09-03 2:53:03 PM



The comments to this entry are closed.