The Shotgun Blog
Monday, May 30, 2005
Posted by Kate McMillan on May 30, 2005 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Heresy:
What is this post trying to say exactly?
Posted by: Gamblog | 2005-05-30 8:29:32 PM
It's more than you deserve, but what it's trying to say is, "Nothing to see here. Move along now. Move along. Nothing to see..."
Posted by: Brian O'Neill | 2005-05-30 10:28:11 PM
It raises a good point. Political correctness should not get in the way of intelligent law enforcement. Anyone ever read the story about the airport guy who let one of the 9/11 groups board? He stated that he had this strange feeling about one of the guys, but ignored it because he was ashamed for buying into the "Muslim-terrorist" stereotype.
Same type of thing goes on in law enforcement. Usually due to political and/or social pressure. Silly me, I thought the purpose of having police was to arrest criminals, regardless of ethnicity. It appears for many, there can be no justice if any one demographic is overrepresented in prison irrespective of whether or not they are actually guilty of committing the crime(s) in question.
Posted by: Shawn | 2005-05-30 11:41:30 PM
It doesn't have to do with criminal activity or crimes being committed, but suspected criminal activity with no proof except the colour of their skin. The stats are for pulling people over and questioning them, not for actual crimes committed.
Posted by: Gamblog | 2005-05-31 6:31:20 AM
OPEN CALL TO ALL COMMIES/BOLSHIES/PINKO/LEFTIES/GLIBBERALS/DIPPERS:
Could you please send some more intelligent people to debate with than the predictable sad-sacks that have been trolling around here.
Warren Kinsella, at least you can write. And it's fun to pick on you.
I feel bad having to constantly bitch-slap "A Hermit" "Gamblog" and "Winston" upside the head. Where's the challenge? It's like shooting fish in a barrel. (Russil Wvong gets a pass since, even though he's in love with that fence, and is obviously confused about the big picture, at least he has a modicum of native intelligence and the capacity for correcting his ways. And "TB" just pops up once in a while to ejaculate some pithy glibberism.)
Obviously those Three Stooges are just cutting and pasting from Bill Graham's speeches (not the SF BG!) and G&M editorials. They make Belinda Stronach look like a genius. If any of them actually had anything intelligent or witty to say, I would drop dead on the spot in complete and utter shock.
So again. Please. I beg of you. Send your best over here. (Someone like a young... a young... hmmm... can't think of any Glib or Dipper charismatic intellectual titans they could model themselves on....) Maybe some bright young thing who's been conned into gliberalsim all her life, and hasn't had the chance to be deprogrammed yet.
Preferably someone female, cute, hot, charming, witty, and single; who lives in Winnipeg and is a good cook; and who is smart enough that she will inevitably wise up and realize that she's really a conservative.
Posted by: Brian O'Neill | 2005-05-31 7:28:26 AM
Thank you for your pointless insults Brian. They really add to the discussion.
Posted by: Gamblog | 2005-05-31 8:04:10 AM
Boo hoo hoo. I'm sowwy, shweety.
Posted by: Brian O'Neill | 2005-05-31 9:07:50 AM
"...charismatic intellectual titans..."
You're talking about Stephen Harper there... The only politician in this country who's actually attracting young people to politics. (and to the polls)
Posted by: Rick | 2005-05-31 10:54:04 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.