The Shotgun Blog
« Obama's victory speech, wordled | Main | Richard Viguerie on why the Republicans lost »
Tuesday, November 04, 2008
North Carolina, Indiana, Missouri, Montana, and the impact of Bob Barr and Ron Paul
Tonight, Indiana and North Carolina look to go blue for president-elect Barack Obama. And in both of these states Bob Barr's vote total made the difference. Missouri looks like it will go McCain, but Barr's vote total still made it closer than it had to be. Meanwhile, Ron Paul appears to be making a difference in Montana, although, within the last fifteen minutes, McCain's numbers have eclipsed Obama's (Obama had a slight lead until just now).
With 99 per cent of precincts reporting in Indiana, Obama has 49.9 per cent of the vote to McCain's 49. Bob Barr has 1.1 per cent.
With 100 per cent of precincts reporting in North Carolina, Obama has 49.8 per cent to McCain's 49.6. Bob Barr has 0.6 per cent.
With 99 per cent of precincts reporting in Missouri, McCain has 49.4 per cent to Obama's 49.3. Bob Barr has 0.4 per cent.
In Montana, with 74 per cent of precincts reporting, McCain is leading with 49.6 per cent to Obama's 47.2. Ron Paul, who didn't run an official campaign at all, and tried to get his name removed from the ballot, is sitting on 2.1 per cent of the vote (Barr has 0.3 per cent).
(All numbers from here)
Posted by P.M. Jaworski on November 4, 2008 in U.S. politics | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b5d69e2010535d3e965970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference North Carolina, Indiana, Missouri, Montana, and the impact of Bob Barr and Ron Paul:
Comments
So if Libertarians are having a Ross Perot effect, is that good or bad? I cannot help but wonder...
Posted by: Charles Martin Cosgriff | 2008-11-05 9:27:46 AM
Given the tiny precentages -- and given the ideological grab bag of supporters attracted to the Libertarian party -- we probably can't read too much into this.
Had Paul been actively campaigning for the Republicans, though, he could have energized new voters. But will never know what impact Paul could have had within his own party had he been given a chance.
Posted by: Matthew Johnston | 2008-11-05 12:13:40 PM
Too bad Ron Paul could not just dump his principals and support McCain, them maybe he would have only lost by a few votes instead of getting smeared...... Juan McCain, who for all his hot air about Pork Barrel Projects and Earmarks had to rush back to Washington from the campaign trail to vote in favor of the fattest welfare check to Americas richest banks, voting yes right in step with his comrade Obama. If McCain had a spine he would have filibustered the bailout but he did not even give a floor speech..... shameful......
Ron Paul gave a floor speech. He told us this was going to happen years ago and Voted NO as he always has on issues that go against the US Constitution.
Now the bankers who created this mess have been given more of our money and more power and we will work for generations to pay the interest to the IRS to cover THEIR bad investments. It is time for the people of this county to wake up and see they way we are all slaves to the money masters.
Posted by: libertynow | 2008-11-11 12:46:12 AM
Consider researching the outstanding two-term Governor of New Mexico, Gary Johnson, for Republican nominee in 2012. I have met Governor Gary Johnson and he would get the full support of millions of Americans in the drug-law reform movement. Mr. Johnson has unassailable integrity, huge intelligence, a great mind, a thorough understanding of the US Constitution, great principles of limited government. He is articulate, sincere and accessible. Indeed, I welcome the news of Mr. Johnson's candidacy. He is just the revitalization the Republican leadership requires.
To add your support for the GARY JOHNSON in 2012 campaign, go here
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=38552147212&ref=nf
Johnson will need to start the dinner & speaking circuit now to develop a leadership role by the next mid-term (2010) election. Our support now may be influential. Calling all Ron Paul Republicans, libertarians, conservatives: let Gary Johnson know you would support his bid to test the waters for a 2012 bid.
Getting the proper, educated Republican candidate in 2012 is so vital. It has to be a limited government constitutionalist who believes in sound money, freedom, the repeal of Prohibition, an end to empire, and an end to the security-surveillance state. Gary Johnson represents that kind of Republican.
Ron Paul will be 76 in 2012. He'd be an excellent adviser to Johnson, and I love Ron Paul. I think Ron would support Gary Johnson for the leadership of the Republican Party. Someone will have to ask Congressman Paul for his opinion on Gary Johnson but I'll tell you now, I know Dr. Paul is an admirer of Johnson's record as Governor of New Mexico.
Posted by: Marc Scott Emery | 2008-11-11 4:12:52 AM
Marc: I came across Gary Johnson when Cato put together a report of the best governors in the U.S.
Apart from Jeff Flake, my other top pick would be Johnson. Keep your eyes on the Western Standard, we'll be writing about him very soon.
Posted by: P.M. Jaworski | 2008-11-11 10:15:29 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.