Western Standard

The Shotgun Blog

« The Politically Correct Police Raid | Main | Monday In Mosul »

Thursday, August 04, 2005

Supremes to re-hear part of case

The Supreme Court of Canada may end up having second thoughts about their interpretation of the Charter in the Dr. Chaoulli and Zeliotis case.

That case, the Western Standard story from last October entitled "Freedom Fighter" (PDF / WEB) is good on details, looked like it might introduce a second, private parallel system to Canada's current not-exactly-so-good one. With Justice Major's retirement, this could get ugly.

According to a press release:

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA -- JUDGMENT IN APPLICATION FOR A RE-HEARING

OTTAWA, 2005-08-04-09:45EDT. THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA HAS TODAY DEPOSITED WITH THE REGISTRAR JUDGMENT IN THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION FOR A RE-HEARING.

FROM: SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (613) 995-4330
                                          

29272 Jacques Chaoulli et George Zeliotis c. Procureur général du Québec et Procureur général du Canada (Qc)

Coram: McLachlin C.J. and Major, Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps and Fish JJ.

The motion for a partial rehearing is granted. The Court’s judgment is stayed for a period of 12 months from the date such judgment was issued, namely June 9, 2005.

Posted by P.M. Jaworski on August 4, 2005 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b5d69e200d83459628869e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Supremes to re-hear part of case:

» Supreme Court Puts Charter Of Rights On Hold from small dead animals
Via local radio: the Supreme Court of Canada has suspended their decision to strike down the Quebec private health-care ban case for 12 months. Put your hand up if this surprises you. update - and that isn't all. They're going... [Read More]

Tracked on 2005-08-04 12:26:40 PM

Comments

Someone help me. When was the last time a case has been re-heard? How many times since 1980?

Posted by: Pete E | 2005-08-04 5:32:27 PM


I believe this says that the ruling has been stayed. In other words, the ruling will stand, but will not take effect for 12 months.

Posted by: Kevin Libin | 2005-08-04 9:33:36 PM


Bring out the healthcare bogey man one more time until the Liberals are safely re-elected then either we can forget it entirely or let real health care creep in on it's own as in Alberta the free province.
Canada's courts will not do anything the Liberal Party doesn't like period.
Dictatorship Canada at your service mes amis.
Duke

Posted by: Duke | 2005-08-05 6:52:45 AM



The comments to this entry are closed.